EVEN AFTER EVERYTHING, ONE ROYAL PRIVILEGE MAY STILL AWAIT ANDREW — A SECRET GOVERNMENT PLAN REPORTEDLY INCLUDES A SURPRISING FINAL HONOUR FOR THE FALLEN FORMER DUKE, LEAVING MANY ASKING WHY THE PALACE HASN’T CLOSED THAT DOOR COMPLETELY.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor due to receive royal ceremonial funeral despite downfall under plans blasted by Epstein victims as ’embarrassment to the Crown’

Andrew Mountbatten–Windsor is due to receive a royal ceremonial funeral – despite his dramatic downfall and being stripped of all his titles.

Senior Whitehall sources have told The Mail on Sunday that the former Duke of York remains on a secret government list of royals who will receive high–profile funerals, even though he became a private citizen following revelations of his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

This newspaper understands the controversial arrangement is part of the Government’s so–called ‘bridge’ plans, which lay out – far in advance and in meticulous detail – the funeral arrangements for members of the Royal Family.

Queen Elizabeth’s funeral in 2022 followed a blueprint known as ‘Operation London Bridge’, while Prince Philip‘s was ‘Operation Forth Bridge’ – after the bridge close to the Scottish capital.

Although the details of the arrangements for Mountbatten–Windsor’s funeral are unknown, royal experts believe a service would be held at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle, where the funerals of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip were held.

The 14th–century chapel also serves as the venue for baptisms and royal weddings, including that of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in 2018.

It is anticipated that Mountbatten–Windsor would be buried at the Royal Burial Ground at Frogmore, a 33–acre private cemetery in Home Park, Windsor.

Others buried there include King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in disgrace in 1936 to marry American socialite Wallis Simpson, who is also buried there.

Senior Whitehall sources have told The Mail on Sunday that the former Duke of York remains on a secret government list of royals who will receive high-profile funerals

Senior Whitehall sources have told The Mail on Sunday that the former Duke of York remains on a secret government list of royals who will receive high–profile funerals

Andrew Mountbatten¿Windsor (left) with Virginia Giuffre (centre) and Ghislaine Maxwell (right) in 2001

Andrew Mountbatten–Windsor (left) with Virginia Giuffre (centre) and Ghislaine Maxwell (right) in 2001

Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011. The former prince became a private citizen following revelations of his friendship with the paedophile financier

Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011. The former prince became a private citizen following revelations of his friendship with the paedophile financier

It is not expected that the plan for 66–year–old Mountbatten–Windsor, which is overseen by the Cabinet Office and kept under constant review, will be required for some time, given that he appears to be in good health.

But on Saturday US lawyer Gloria Allred, who has represented 27 of Epstein’s victims, said: ‘Andrew has brought disgrace upon the Royal Family and the UK as a result of his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.

‘Under these circumstances, the question arises as to why this man should be afforded the honour of a royal funeral. What kind of message would such a ceremony send to Epstein’s victims?

‘Additionally, why should UK taxpayers bear the burden of paying his expenses either in life or after his death?’

Alicia Kearns, Tory shadow Home Office minister, said: ‘There are no circumstances under which Andrew should be afforded a royal funeral.

‘He should live out his days far from public life, and the police and CPS should ensure their investigations into him are robust and don’t drag on. All such plans should be revoked immediately.’

Norman Baker, a former government minister and expert in royal finances, said: ‘This must be an oversight. Mr Mountbatten–Windsor is a commoner and should in no way be getting any sort of royal funeral.’

The ‘bridge’ plan for Andrew is likely to have been revised in the past year to take into account that he is no longer a working royal. In a humiliating blow, King Charles stripped his brother of his HRH style and prince title in November last year.

Although the details of the arrangements for Mountbatten-Windsor¿s funeral are unknown, royal experts believe a service would be held at St George¿s Chapel in Windsor Castle

Although the details of the arrangements for Mountbatten–Windsor’s funeral are unknown, royal experts believe a service would be held at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle

Royal experts believe Mountbatten–Windsor’s funeral would be similar to that of Princess Margaret, who died in 2002 aged 71 after a stroke and cardiac complications. A 400–strong congregation, including 30 royals, attended a private service in St George’s Chapel. Flags were flown at half–mast at all royal residences throughout a six–day period of mourning.

Ahead of the funeral, the princess’s coffin was laid in Kensington Palace, where her family paid their respects. It was draped in Margaret’s standard and a spray of white lilies and roses and was then taken to the Queen’s Chapel at St James’s Palace.

The coffin was then driven to Windsor where police had to erect barriers for 3,000 people to watch the cortege enter the castle gates.

In a break from royal tradition, which is unlikely to feature in Mountbatten–Windsor’s plans, Princess Margaret was later cremated at Slough Crematorium.

While not an official state or public occasion, the funeral was a major royal event that was accompanied by a costly policing and security operation.

One delicate matter the former Duke may have to ponder in the coming years is who will act as pallbearers during his ceremony.

Servicemen from regiments associated with members of the Royal Family normally have the honour of carrying their coffin.

Eight sergeants from the Royal Highland Fusiliers, of which Princess Margaret was the colonel–in–chief, carried her coffin.

Tory Shadow Home Office Minister Alicia Kearns (pictured in the Commons last November) said: 'There are no circumstances under which Andrew should be afforded a royal funeral'

Tory Shadow Home Office Minister Alicia Kearns (pictured in the Commons last November) said: ‘There are no circumstances under which Andrew should be afforded a royal funeral’

Tory MP Joe Robertson (pictured) said: ¿Public funds should not bankroll Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor¿s funeral. He has lost all his royal titles and publicly funded roles for a reason'

Tory MP Joe Robertson (pictured) said: ‘Public funds should not bankroll Andrew Mountbatten–Windsor’s funeral. He has lost all his royal titles and publicly funded roles for a reason’

Mountbatten–Windsor served in the Royal Navy, including during the Falklands War as a Sea King helicopter co–pilot, and was the honorary colonel of the Grenadier Guards, the Royal Irish Regiment, and the Royal Regiment of Scotland. However, he lost his military titles amid the Epstein scandal.

Retired Rear Admiral Chris Parry, who captained the Royal Navy’s HMS Fearless, said he believed the Navy would ask for volunteers to act as pallbearers.

‘The guy doesn’t relinquish being a naval officer,’ he said. ‘He wasn’t thrown out. He had a Falklands medal and you can’t take that away from him and he deserves the credit for that. If somebody said to me ‘Would you do it?’, I’d do it.’

US lawyer Spencer Kuvin, who represented nine of Epstein’s victims, said: ‘Taxpayers should not ever be funding a funeral for a private individual. No public money should be used to benefit him during death. It’s an embarrassment to the Crown.’

Tory MP Joe Robertson said: ‘Public funds should not bankroll Andrew Mountbatten–Windsor’s funeral. He has lost all his royal titles and publicly funded roles for a reason. He is an ordinary citizen – one who still has a lot of questions to answer – and his funeral should be paid for privately just like everyone else.’

The Cabinet Office and Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Mountbatten–Windsor did not respond to a request to comment.

Credit: Daily Mail

Related Posts

MO SALAH’S EMOTIONAL LIVERPOOL ADMISSION: The former Reds star has revealed the one thing he would definitely do if he ever came up against his beloved former club, admitting he would have “mixed feelings” after leaving Anfield for Trabzonspor. His revealing words offer a fascinating glimpse into how Salah really feels about facing Liverpool again, and why the reunion could be far more emotional than fans expect.

Mohamed Salah Admits ‘Mixed Feelings’ at Prospect of Facing Liverpool After Anfield Exit Mohamed Salah has spoken for the first time about the emotional complexity of potentially…

JAMIE VARDY’S SHOCK NEW LIFE AT BURNLEY REVEALED: The England hero and wife Rebekah have traded their glamorous £2million Lake Garda mansion for a very different chapter in the north after his surprise move from Italy. But beyond the huge change of scenery, Vardy’s new life at Burnley is already revealing just how dramatically different his latest football adventure will be.

Inside Jamie Vardy’s New Life in Burnley as England Hero and Wife Rebekah Leave Behind £2million Lake Garda Mansion Jamie Vardy is swapping the shores of Lake…

JOEY BARTON’S JAIL BOMBSHELL: The former footballer will remain behind bars for months after his latest bail bid was refused, following the dramatic delay of his trial over an alleged golf club assault that prosecutors say left the victim facing potentially devastating eye injuries. With Barton now set to stay in custody until next year, one extraordinary twist has changed the entire timeline of the case.

Joey Barton to Remain Behind Bars Until 2027 After Bail Bid Rejected Over Golf Club Assault Allegations Former professional footballer Joey Barton will spend the rest of…

THE ROYAL DISTANCE QUESTION — Why Prince William and Princess Catherine’s Approach To Harry and Meghan Remains A Fascinating Question Prince William and Princess Catherine have recently been linked to renewed discussion about their relationship with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, with reports suggesting that their approach remains unchanged regardless of where the Sussexes choose to live. From California to the UK and even further away, the focus has returned to how the Waleses continue their public roles while maintaining their own path. While the situation may highlight William and Catherine’s commitment to their responsibilities and long-term vision, it has also raised fresh questions about the wider family dynamic, personal distance and whether future developments could change the current situation. The discussion has renewed attention on Prince William and Princess Catherine’s relationship with the Royal Family’s past challenges and whether a different chapter could eventually emerge. For the Waleses, the real challenge may be balancing public expectations with their commitment to duty, particularly as the legacy of the monarchy continues to shape the way their actions are viewed.

A source close to the Prince and Princess of Wales has suggested that the location of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle makes little difference to William and…

THE SECURITY QUESTION — Why Prince Harry and Meghan’s Return To The UK Remains A Fascinating Question Prince Harry and Meghan have recently been linked to renewed questions surrounding their security arrangements after returning to the UK with their children, from concerns over daily routines such as the school run to wider discussions about their future life in Britain. While the move may represent a new chapter for the Sussexes and their family, it has also raised fresh questions about the practical challenges and responsibilities that come with living in the UK again. The situation has renewed attention on Harry and Meghan’s relationship with Britain, public expectations and their ongoing connection with royal life, while questions remain over how their security needs will be managed. For the couple, the real challenge may be balancing a more private family routine with the level of attention that continues to surround them, particularly as questions about their return and future plans remain unresolved.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly facing a significant security dilemma following their return to the United Kingdom, with the daily school run said to be…

THE DIANA LEGACY QUESTION — Why Prince Harry’s Future Connection With Britain Remains A Fascinating Question Prince Harry’s expected absence from a major London event celebrating his late mother’s legacy has raised fresh questions about his relationship with the UK, from his continued connection to Princess Diana’s memory to his reported plans for spending more time closer to home. While the decision may simply reflect personal circumstances and changing priorities, it has also renewed attention on the deeper question of how Harry views his place in Britain today. The situation has brought fresh focus to Prince Harry’s relationship with his family, his former home and the legacy he continues to carry through Diana’s influence, particularly after reports that he and Meghan Markle have relocated back to the UK with their children. For Harry, the challenge may be balancing his new chapter with the expectations attached to his royal background, especially as his mother’s legacy continues to shape public interest. But one question remains: could Harry’s changing connection with Britain signal a new direction in his relationship with the Royal Family and his place within the story of his mother’s enduring legacy?

Prince Harry’s reported decision to stay away from an upcoming London event dedicated to his late mother Princess Diana has sparked renewed discussion about his return to…