Fresh allegations circulating in celebrity circles have reignited scrutiny around Nicola Peltz’s past relationships, painting a sharply contrasting picture to the polished public image she presents today as Brooklyn Beckham’s wife. According to unnamed sources cited in recent gossip discussions, Peltz’s relationship with Anwar Hadid—prior to her marriage—was allegedly marked by intense emotional volatility and controlling behavior. It is important to note that these claims remain unverified and are based on accounts attributed to individuals described as “close to the situation.”

Those sources allege that during her time with Anwar Hadid, the youngest of the Hadid siblings, Peltz exercised what they characterize as “obsessive control,” frequently monitoring decisions and reacting strongly to perceived slights. The relationship, they claim, was emotionally charged and unpredictable, with sudden mood shifts that left Anwar “constantly on edge.” While such language is dramatic, it reflects the tone of the allegations rather than established fact.

According to these accounts, Peltz was said to “switch personalities” without warning—appearing calm and affectionate one moment, then erupting into anger the next. Insiders describe frequent arguments and confrontations, alleging that these episodes created a climate of emotional instability. Again, no independent corroboration has been provided, and neither Peltz nor Hadid has publicly commented on these claims.

The relationship between Nicola Peltz and Anwar Hadid, which took place several years ago, was relatively low-profile at the time. Both were young, navigating public life under intense scrutiny, and balancing demanding family legacies. Anwar, brother to supermodels Gigi and Bella Hadid, has since largely retreated from high-profile romantic headlines, focusing instead on music and personal pursuits. Peltz, by contrast, has moved into a far brighter spotlight following her marriage into the Beckham family.

What fuels renewed interest in these allegations is the stark contrast between the reported past and the present narrative. Today, Peltz is frequently portrayed as confident, composed, and financially powerful—a billionaire heiress who publicly asserts independence and control over her own life. The resurfacing of claims about volatility and control has led critics to question whether the earlier relationship dynamics were misrepresented at the time, or whether they are now being reinterpreted through a more critical lens.

Observers also point out that relationships in one’s early twenties can be emotionally intense without necessarily defining a person’s character long-term. Supporters of Peltz argue that anonymous allegations should be treated with caution, particularly when they emerge years after the relationship ended and coincide with heightened public attention surrounding her marriage to Brooklyn Beckham. From this perspective, the claims may say more about the celebrity rumor ecosystem than about the individuals involved.

Others, however, argue that patterns matter. They suggest that if multiple insiders describe similar behaviors—such as emotional outbursts or controlling tendencies—those accounts deserve consideration, even if they remain anecdotal. Still, without direct statements from Anwar Hadid or documented evidence, the narrative remains speculative.

It is also notable that neither party has revisited their relationship publicly. Anwar Hadid has never spoken negatively about Peltz in interviews, and Peltz herself has rarely addressed past romances, choosing instead to focus on her current life and marriage. This silence leaves space for rumor to flourish but offers no confirmation.

In the broader context of celebrity culture, such stories are not uncommon. High-profile relationships are often retroactively reframed, especially when one party enters a new, more visible chapter of life. The line between legitimate concern and sensationalized storytelling can become blurred, particularly when unnamed sources and emotionally charged language dominate the narrative.

As of now, the claims that Nicola Peltz was “obsessively controlling” or prone to explosive behavior toward Anwar Hadid remain allegations—unproven, unaddressed, and contested by implication. What is clear is that her past relationships are being re-examined under a harsher spotlight as her public profile grows.

Until direct statements or verifiable evidence emerge, these accounts should be understood for what they are: disputed recollections from anonymous sources, rather than established truths. In the absence of confirmation, the story serves less as a definitive portrait of Nicola Peltz’s past and more as a reminder of how quickly narratives can shift once fame, power, and perception collide.