FIFA IN FULL-BLOWN CRISIS: Gianni Infantino is facing one of the gravest accusations of his presidency after being publicly accused of “blackmail” as outrage over the failed World Cup sell-off refuses to fade. With powerful figures across world football turning against him, one explosive claim has pushed the scandal into dangerous new territory and intensified calls for the FIFA president to step down.

Embattled FIFA president Gianni Infantino is accused of BLACKMAIL by head of Jordan FA in extraordinary statement

Jordan FA president Prince Ali bin Hussein has accused Gianni Infantino of blackmail as pressure continues to mount on the FIFA president.

Infantino has come under intense scrutiny since plans to sell £3.1billion in World Cup stakes leaked last week.

The Swiss football administrator has since scrapped the proposals after widespread opposition – including an internal rebellion at FIFA.

UEFA and Concacaf – the body for North and Central America and the Caribbean – are both calling for Infantino to step down, with Europe declaring a lack of confidence in the FIFA president.

Jordan, meanwhile, are the first Asian nation to rebel against Infantino – taking the total to 91, assuming all UEFA and CONCACAF nations follow the stance set by their continental bodies. 106 nations are needed to depose Infantino as president.

In a statement Hussein ripped into Infantino, accusing him of delaying prize money payments and refusing to address the problem unless Jordan endorsed him for a fourth term at the helm of world football.

Gianni Infantino has been accused of blackmail by Jordan FA president Prince Ali bin Hussein

Gianni Infantino has been accused of blackmail by Jordan FA president Prince Ali bin Hussein

Hussein ripped into Infantino, accusing him of delaying prize money payments and refusing to address the problem unless Jordan endorsed him for a fourth term at the helm of world football

Hussein ripped into Infantino, accusing him of delaying prize money payments and refusing to address the problem unless Jordan endorsed him for a fourth term at the helm of world football

‘There is no shortage of issues regarding FIFA. Let me start by clarifying what some of these are from an FA perspective, in particular that of Jordan going into a World Cup for the first time,’ Hussein said

‘We are a small country with a minimal budget for our FA and had to deal with enormous hurdles.

‘First, getting our fans into the USA: not all were granted VISAS, even though they had tickets – which we also know were sold at exorbitant prices.

‘Secondly, we are being taxed by the US government through FIFA for our participation. Money that should go to players and staff.

‘This was not the case for those who played and set up camp in Canada and Mexico. But we happened to be in the USA so now we face these huge costs in taxes for having participated.

‘Thirdly we have been waiting for reward money for our players since December for the Arab Cup in Qatar, which is a FIFA event.

‘The money our team should receive for having reached the final has not been delivered yet, while at the same time FIFA brags about how many billions they have in reserve.

‘It is clear the problem really is with leadership. For months, FIFA has been refusing to help us on any of these or other matters – until it was verbally communicated to me during the World Cup that if I endorsed Infantino it would go a long way to helping our FA out.

‘We pride ourselves in Jordan in upholding ethical values. We did not endorse him before and certainly will not now.

‘But the whole situation amounts to blackmail and we refuse to give in to that.’

Daily Mail Sport have contacted FIFA for comment.

Former FIFA vice president Prince Ali bin Al Hussein criticized the soccer body’s leadership headed by Gianni Infantino on Tuesday, describing prize money withheld from his Jordan national team as a kind of blackmail.

Prince Ali said the Jordanian federation he leads still has not been paid money due for reaching the final of the FIFA Arab Cup played last December in Qatar.

In a social media post, Prince Ali said that during the World Cup — where Jordan made their debut in June — he was told if he endorsed FIFA president Infantino “it would go a long way to helping our FA out.”

Infantino is under pressure to save his 11-year presidency amid a fierce backlash from global soccer leaders about his now-failed plan to sell a stake in future World Cup profits to investors led by Joshua Kushner.

“We pride ourselves in Jordan in upholding ethical values. We did not endorse him before and certainly will not now,” said Prince Ali, who placed third in a five-candidate FIFA presidential contest when Infantino was first elected in February 2016.

“But the whole situation amounts to blackmail and we refuse to give in to that,” the Jordanian royal wrote Tuesday.

The 2025 FIFA Arab Cup that Jordan lost in the title match against Morocco was set to pay $4.2 million to the beaten finalist, Jordanian media reported last year.

“The money our team should receive for having reached the final has not been delivered yet,” Prince Ali wrote, “while at the same time FIFA brags about how many billions they have in reserve.”

“It is clear the problem really is with leadership. For months, FIFA has been refusing to help us on any of these or other matters,” he said.

FIFA was approached for comment about the claims.

Prince Ali was elected by Asian soccer to serve on FIFA’s ruling executive committee from 2011 to ’15, and stood against then-president Sepp Blatter in a May 2015 election. That vote to reelect Blatter was held in the shadow of raids at Zurich hotels two days earlier to arrest soccer officials as part of investigations by U.S. and Swiss federal agencies.

Infantino had seemed a lock to be reelected unopposed for a fourth and final term leading FIFA through 2031 when he left New York two weeks after the World Cup final.

Fallout from his secretive private equity plan revealed one week ago has rocked soccer politics with Infantino’s former colleagues at European soccer body UEFA now looking for a rival candidate. The proposal underwritten by Kushner’s Thrive Eternal fund would have paid $20 million each to Jordan and all other FIFA members had they accepted by a Sept. 19 deadline

UEFA also is threatening a boycott of FIFA games, events and meetings, while the leadership of the North American soccer body Concacaf and the Asian Football Confederation, of which Jordan is a member, also have spoken out against Infantino.

FIFA has set a Nov. 18 deadline for candidates to declare for the election by 211 member federations on March 18 in Rabat, Morocco.

Asia is seen as the key continent in any presidential contest that might yet be forced, with Europe and nations from North America, Central America and the Caribbean expected to want Infantino out while Africa, South America and Oceania are expected to back him.

Related Posts

THE COMMENT THAT’S BACK IN THE SPOTLIGHT — Why Prince Harry’s Past Words About King Charles Are Being Revisited A previously reported remark by Prince Harry about King Charles has resurfaced as fresh royal speculation continues to dominate headlines, prompting commentators to re-examine one of the Duke of Sussex’s most talked-about moments. Royal experts say the comment, described by some as “tactless,” has gained renewed attention because it is now being viewed through the lens of the latest rumours surrounding the Royal Family and the continuing relationship between father and son. But one question has royal watchers talking: why has Prince Harry’s old comment suddenly become relevant again—and could its reappearance reveal how deeply the tensions within the Royal Family are still being felt today?

THE ROYAL TENSION THAT WON’T DISAPPEAR — Why Prince Harry’s Relationship With King Charles Remains Under Scrutiny The relationship between Prince Harry and King Charles continues to…

THE PARENTING PACT EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT — Why Prince William And Kate Middleton’s Reported Agreement For Their Children Has Captured Attention Prince William and Kate Middleton have reportedly reached a shared understanding about how they want to raise Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, with royal commentators suggesting the approach reflects their determination to balance royal duty with as normal a childhood as possible. The reported agreement has reignited discussion about how the Prince and Princess of Wales are preparing their children for life inside the monarchy while protecting them from unnecessary public pressure. But one question has royal watchers intrigued: what is the reported agreement William and Kate have made for their children—and could it shape the future of the next generation of the Royal Family?

THE FUTURE OF THE MONARCHY’S NEXT GENERATION — Why Prince William And Kate Middleton Remain Under Intense Spotlight Prince William and Kate Middleton have become two of…

THE ROYAL EXIT THAT STILL SHAPES THE MONARCHY — Why Prince Harry And Meghan Markle’s Departure Continues To Spark Debate Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to step back from royal duties continues to be one of the most discussed moments in modern royal history, with authors and royal commentators arguing that its effects are still being felt across the monarchy. Years after their departure, the conversation has expanded beyond the couple themselves to questions about the institution’s public image, generational change and how the Royal Family has adapted in their absence. But one question continues to divide royal watchers: did Harry and Meghan’s royal exit permanently change the monarchy—or is its biggest impact only now beginning to emerge?

THE ROYAL STORY THAT STILL CAPTIVATES THE WORLD — Why Prince Harry And Meghan Markle Remain At The Centre Of Attention Few modern royal stories have generated…

THE BIRTHDAY SNUB THAT HAS EVERYONE TALKING — Why Royal Experts Think Meghan Markle Was Left Out On Her 45th Birthday Meghan Markle’s 45th birthday has sparked fresh royal speculation after commentators and royal experts questioned the apparent lack of public recognition from members of the Royal Family. The silence has reignited discussion about the ongoing distance between the Sussexes and the monarchy, with many wondering whether the absence of public birthday wishes reflects protocol, personal tensions or simply the reality of an increasingly separate relationship. But one question continues to fuel debate: was Meghan Markle deliberately snubbed on her milestone birthday—or does the silence reveal just how far relations between the Sussexes and the Royal Family have changed?

WHY MEGHAN MARKLE REMAINS A ROYAL TALKING POINT — Experts Examine The Choices That Changed Her Public Image Years after stepping away from official royal duties, Meghan…

A NEW ROYAL ARRIVAL? — Why The British Royal Family’s Latest Baby Announcement Has Everyone Smiling Royal watchers are celebrating after news of a new addition to the British Royal Family was accompanied by an adorable first photograph, immediately capturing attention across social media. The heartwarming image has sparked excitement among royal fans, with many eager to learn more about the family’s newest member and what the arrival could mean for the next generation of the monarchy. But one question has everyone talking: what makes this newest royal arrival so special—and why has the first photo already become one of the most talked-about royal moments of the year?

A NEW ROYAL CHAPTER BEGINS — British Royal Family Announcement Sparks Celebration Around The World The British royal family has once again captured global attention following the…

PRINCE WILLIAM MAY NEVER SEE HARRY THE SAME WAY AGAIN — BUT INSIDERS BELIEVE THERE’S ONE PAINFUL DECISION BY KING CHARLES HE COULD STILL CHOOSE TO STAND BEHIND

The Real Reason Prince William Will Back King Charles’s ‘Painful’ Olive Branch to Prince Harry—Despite Refusing to Forgive His Estranged Brother The Prince of Wales may harbor…